Going Green: Local lawmakers embrace green building standards

September 10, 2008

Whether in the congested suburbs of major urban centers or in smaller communities around the country, local lawmakers have embraced green building standards. Those standards are exemplified, if not defined outright, by the LEED criteria adopted by the private U.S. Green Building Council.

LEED – it stands for “Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design.”

Local officials are “absolutely swayed” by the badge of environmental sensitivity that comes with LEED certification, according to one prominent urban planning expert. “It’s something a developer knows will cause a review board to approve a project,” said Jeff Speck, former director of design for the National Endowment for the Arts.

Many urban governments are going beyond simply smiling on green building projects when they come forward, Speck said. “Some cities are requiring all new construction of a certain size to be LEED certified,” he noted.

Northern Virginia, adjacent to Washington, D.C., is no exception to the movement. In fact, some leaders in the region want to be right at the LEED forefront.

Arlington County, for example, is deliberately pushing the limits of state law to insist on green standards for development. A decade ago, Arlington pioneered green building standards through its planning and zoning approval process.

Now, other local governments throughout the Washington area are comparing notes and trying new regulatory schemes to encourage sustainable development.

In the absence of federal green building standards, the LEED program emerged as the de facto national standard for local rules on sustainable design.

LEED’s widespread acceptance presents one concern, according to Speck: Rigidity that could be imposed by universal adoption of the LEED standards. When nearly every locality uses the same list of environmental criteria, he explained, no one is encouraged explore new ideas for sustainable design.

“If LEED becomes a normal requirement in most cities in the country, we have a problem because we have fewer places where we can be truly innovative. Truly innovative projects will use technologies that are not rewarded by any incentive program,” he said.

Speck says cities have not reached that point yet. “Since we’re so early on the curve, I feel very comfortable advocating for LEED,” Speck commented. “We’re not at risk yet of stifling innovation.”

While LEED certification may open doors for developers seeking official approval, Speck says the green trend is not fueling its own development boom. “I do not think it’s accurate that any part of the country is seeing a building boom because of LEED,” he said.

“What you are seeing,” he added, “is that companies that provide green building materials and green expertise are flourishing.”
Speck and other development experts hail a new development in the LEED program that expands the focus to include a building’s location and neighborhood resources. Known as LEED Neighborhood Development, or LEED-ND, the new criteria address where a LEED project is located and how it is accessed.

“Smart growth advocates have criticized LEED for not placing as much importance on location as design,” Speck said.

One of those smart growth advocates is Cheryl Cort with the Coalition for Smarter Growth in the Washington metropolitan area. “The challenge is that we need to guide growth so that it is giving people environmentally friendly transportation choices,” she said. The pilot criteria being developed for LEED-ND will address that concern, she commented.

Written by Peter Vieth  |  Filed Under Environmental 

Comments

Got something to say?